Traders' 72% implied probability on "No" for Pakistan military action against Kabul by March 31 reflects the absence of official announcements or credible intelligence signaling direct strikes on Afghanistan's capital. Recent cross-border tensions, including Pakistan's airstrikes in eastern Afghan provinces like Khost and Paktia targeting Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants, have remained confined to peripheral border areas rather than escalating centrally. Diplomatic channels between Islamabad and Kabul persist amid mutual condemnations, with no primary sources indicating invasion preparations or ultimatums. Ongoing de-escalation talks and historical precedent of limited incursions underpin the market's consensus on low risk.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data · UpdatedPakistan military action against Kabul by March 31?
Pakistan military action against Kabul by March 31?
For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "military action" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by Pakistani military forces that impact within one of the 22 municipal districts of Kabul.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land within the municipality of Kabul or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, FPV or ground based ATGM strikes directly, ground incursions, naval shelling, cyberattacks, or other operations conducted by Pakistani ground operatives will not qualify.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
If the date/time of a strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by the end of the third calendar date after this market's end date, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
Market Opened: Mar 17, 2026, 8:11 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "military action" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by Pakistani military forces that impact within one of the 22 municipal districts of Kabul.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land within the municipality of Kabul or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, FPV or ground based ATGM strikes directly, ground incursions, naval shelling, cyberattacks, or other operations conducted by Pakistani ground operatives will not qualify.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
If the date/time of a strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by the end of the third calendar date after this market's end date, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Traders' 72% implied probability on "No" for Pakistan military action against Kabul by March 31 reflects the absence of official announcements or credible intelligence signaling direct strikes on Afghanistan's capital. Recent cross-border tensions, including Pakistan's airstrikes in eastern Afghan provinces like Khost and Paktia targeting Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants, have remained confined to peripheral border areas rather than escalating centrally. Diplomatic channels between Islamabad and Kabul persist amid mutual condemnations, with no primary sources indicating invasion preparations or ultimatums. Ongoing de-escalation talks and historical precedent of limited incursions underpin the market's consensus on low risk.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data · Updated


Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions